This section presents comparisons between analytical solutions and modelled solutions using gprMax.
Hertzian dipole in free space¶
This example is of a Hertzian dipole, i.e. an additive source (electric current density), in free space.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
#title: Hertzian dipole in free-space #domain: 0.100 0.100 0.100 #dx_dy_dz: 0.001 0.001 0.001 #time_window: 3e-9 #waveform: gaussiandot 1 1e9 myWave #hertzian_dipole: z 0.050 0.050 0.050 myWave #rx: 0.070 0.070 0.070
hertzian_dipole_fs, which can be found in the
analytical_solutions module in the
tests sub-package, computes the analytical solution.
Fig. 46 shows the time history of the electric and magnetic field components of the modelled and analytical solutions. The responses completely overlap one another due to their similarity. Therefore, Fig. 47 shows the percentage differences between the modelled and analytical solutions.
The match between the analytical and numerically modelled solutions is excellent. The maximum difference is approximately 1%, which is observed in the Ez field component (the same direction as the Hertzian dipole source). The other electric field components exhibit maximum differences of approximately 0.5%, and the magnetic field components 0.25%.
Half-wave dipole in free space¶
See the section on antenna example models for the simulated s11 parameter and input impedance of a half-wave dipole antenna in free space. The resonant frequency and input impedance from the model agree very well with the theoretical predictions for a half-wave dipole antenna.